<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>dragonfly editorial &#187; Oxford University Press</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dragonflyeditorial.com/blog/oxford-university-press/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dragonflyeditorial.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 18:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Oxford University Press&#8217;s Classics Book Club</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonflyeditorial.com/oxford-university-presss-classics-book-club/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dragonflyeditorial.com/oxford-university-presss-classics-book-club/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 22:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Land of Literature]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dragonflyeditorial.com/~blog/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p id="top" />
<p>OMG! OUP has a book club! And it&#8217;s about classics! (Sound of me fainting dead away).</p>
<p>(Sound of me picking self up.) OK, ANYWAY, <a title="OUP blog on the Secret Agent" href="http://blog.oup.com/2007/05/secret_agent-3/">last month&#8217;s book</a> was Joseph Conrad&#8217;s <a title="The Secret Agent" href="http://www.amazon.com/Secret-Agent-Oxford-Worlds-Classics/dp/0192801694/ref=si3_rdr_bb_product/002-3155642-0968838"><em>The Secret Agent</em></a>. I&#8217;ve never read this and have just ordered it from the library. <a title="OUP blog on Tess of the D'Urbervilles" href="http://blog.oup.com/2007/06/oxford_classics/">The current book, the one for June</a>, is Thomas Hardy&#8217;s <a title="Tess of the D'Urbervilles" href="http://www.amazon.com/Tess-dUrbervilles-Oxford-Worlds-Classics/dp/019284069X/ref=sr_1_7/104-2713781-2895951?ie=UTF8&#038;s=books&#038;qid=1181154873&#038;sr=1-7"><em>Tess of the D&#8217;Urbervilles</em></a>.</p>
<p>Now, in the interest of full disclosure, I will reveal that I started to read <em>Tess </em>about a year ago, got about a third of the way through, and found it so full of impending dread that I had to put it down. If I recall, Tess was about to make a terrible mistake driven by guilt and doubt and desire, a mistake that you just knew would wind up coming back to haunt her a hundredfold.</p>
<p>By myself, I just couldn&#8217;t bear to finish the book and see poor Tess crushed by circumstance and fate (at least, this is what seemed to me was going to happen). But for Oxford &#8230; I&#8217;ll pick it up where I left off and do my darnedest.
</p>
<p><!--b66f006ea9b5aeed4e309fe7071a0ada-->
</p>
<p><!--222d2eb8b2b7c6d87b0601d950fb19c0-->
</p>
<p><!--13ce92f358defd79ffbdc67dd18fb0bf--></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="top" />
<p>OMG! OUP has a book club! And it&#8217;s about classics! (Sound of me fainting dead away).</p>
<p>(Sound of me picking self up.) OK, ANYWAY, <a title="OUP blog on the Secret Agent" href="http://blog.oup.com/2007/05/secret_agent-3/">last month&#8217;s book</a> was Joseph Conrad&#8217;s <a title="The Secret Agent" href="http://www.amazon.com/Secret-Agent-Oxford-Worlds-Classics/dp/0192801694/ref=si3_rdr_bb_product/002-3155642-0968838"><em>The Secret Agent</em></a>. I&#8217;ve never read this and have just ordered it from the library. <a title="OUP blog on Tess of the D'Urbervilles" href="http://blog.oup.com/2007/06/oxford_classics/">The current book, the one for June</a>, is Thomas Hardy&#8217;s <a title="Tess of the D'Urbervilles" href="http://www.amazon.com/Tess-dUrbervilles-Oxford-Worlds-Classics/dp/019284069X/ref=sr_1_7/104-2713781-2895951?ie=UTF8&#038;s=books&#038;qid=1181154873&#038;sr=1-7"><em>Tess of the D&#8217;Urbervilles</em></a>.</p>
<p>Now, in the interest of full disclosure, I will reveal that I started to read <em>Tess </em>about a year ago, got about a third of the way through, and found it so full of impending dread that I had to put it down. If I recall, Tess was about to make a terrible mistake driven by guilt and doubt and desire, a mistake that you just knew would wind up coming back to haunt her a hundredfold.</p>
<p>By myself, I just couldn&#8217;t bear to finish the book and see poor Tess crushed by circumstance and fate (at least, this is what seemed to me was going to happen). But for Oxford &#8230; I&#8217;ll pick it up where I left off and do my darnedest.
</p>
<p><!--b66f006ea9b5aeed4e309fe7071a0ada-->
</p>
<p><!--222d2eb8b2b7c6d87b0601d950fb19c0-->
</p>
<p><!--13ce92f358defd79ffbdc67dd18fb0bf--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dragonflyeditorial.com/oxford-university-presss-classics-book-club/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EVOO in Oxford</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonflyeditorial.com/evoo-in-oxford/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dragonflyeditorial.com/evoo-in-oxford/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 05:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Dictionary drama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reference materials]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dragonflyeditorial.com/~blog/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p id="top" />
<p>Oh, for frack&#8217;s sake. The <a title="Washington Post article on Rachael Ray and EVOO" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/19/AR2006121900255.html">Washington Post</a> reports that Rachael Ray&#8217;s catchword <em>EVOO </em>&#8211; that&#8217;s short for extra-virgin olive oil, for those of you not yet in the know &#8212; is to be included in the 2007 edition of the <a title="Oxford American Dictionary 2005" href="http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Reference/EnglishDictionaries/?view=usa&#038;ci=9780195170771">Oxford American College Dictionary</a>.</p>
<p><a title="Mouse Potato in the Dictionary?" href="http://dragonflyeditorial.com/~blog/?p=4">How many times do I have to say this</a>, people? Save this shite for the <a title="Oxford Dictionary of Slang" href="http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Reference/EnglishDictionaries/?view=usa&#038;ci=9780198607632">Oxford Dictionary of Slang</a>!
</p>
<p><!--665974053c17b68b19e16f918a460ebc-->
</p>
<p><!--9557eac471340be73d6dcc42cfa8bb84--></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="top" />
<p>Oh, for frack&#8217;s sake. The <a title="Washington Post article on Rachael Ray and EVOO" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/19/AR2006121900255.html">Washington Post</a> reports that Rachael Ray&#8217;s catchword <em>EVOO </em>&#8211; that&#8217;s short for extra-virgin olive oil, for those of you not yet in the know &#8212; is to be included in the 2007 edition of the <a title="Oxford American Dictionary 2005" href="http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Reference/EnglishDictionaries/?view=usa&#038;ci=9780195170771">Oxford American College Dictionary</a>.</p>
<p><a title="Mouse Potato in the Dictionary?" href="http://dragonflyeditorial.com/~blog/?p=4">How many times do I have to say this</a>, people? Save this shite for the <a title="Oxford Dictionary of Slang" href="http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Reference/EnglishDictionaries/?view=usa&#038;ci=9780198607632">Oxford Dictionary of Slang</a>!
</p>
<p><!--665974053c17b68b19e16f918a460ebc-->
</p>
<p><!--9557eac471340be73d6dcc42cfa8bb84--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dragonflyeditorial.com/evoo-in-oxford/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Land of Typos, part Jane Eyre</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonflyeditorial.com/land-of-typos-part-gazillion-and-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dragonflyeditorial.com/land-of-typos-part-gazillion-and-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Land of Typos]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dragonflyeditorial.com/~blog/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p id="top" />
<p>OK, this is a good one &#8230; from venerated publisher <a title="Oxford University Press website" href="http://www.oup.com/us/?view=usa">Oxford University Press</a>. Oxford just published a book called <a title="Description of Charlotte Bronte's Jane Eyre: A Casebook" href="http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/LiteratureEnglish/BritishLiterature/19thC/?view=usa&#038;ci=9780195177794">Charlotte Bronte&#8217;s Jane Eyre: A Casebook</a>. Here&#8217;s a description of the book in Oxford&#8217;s online &#8220;Literature Newsletter&#8221;:</p>
<blockquote><p><font size="1" face="verdana">           This book provides a series of essays by <em>Jane Eyre</em> that are lucidly and passionately written, and carefully researched and argued while still being accessible to the general reading public.</font></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Oxford is even better than I thought if they were somehow able to summon one of fiction&#8217;s best-loved heroines <em>and </em>convince her to write a series of essays. Go Oxford!
</p>
<p><!--b5fbf3c1dbd649274166294871027619-->
</p>
<p><!--a9504af6de31127bc1ad8fda5dc5303f--></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="top" />
<p>OK, this is a good one &#8230; from venerated publisher <a title="Oxford University Press website" href="http://www.oup.com/us/?view=usa">Oxford University Press</a>. Oxford just published a book called <a title="Description of Charlotte Bronte's Jane Eyre: A Casebook" href="http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/LiteratureEnglish/BritishLiterature/19thC/?view=usa&#038;ci=9780195177794">Charlotte Bronte&#8217;s Jane Eyre: A Casebook</a>. Here&#8217;s a description of the book in Oxford&#8217;s online &#8220;Literature Newsletter&#8221;:</p>
<blockquote><p><font size="1" face="verdana">           This book provides a series of essays by <em>Jane Eyre</em> that are lucidly and passionately written, and carefully researched and argued while still being accessible to the general reading public.</font></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Oxford is even better than I thought if they were somehow able to summon one of fiction&#8217;s best-loved heroines <em>and </em>convince her to write a series of essays. Go Oxford!
</p>
<p><!--b5fbf3c1dbd649274166294871027619-->
</p>
<p><!--a9504af6de31127bc1ad8fda5dc5303f--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dragonflyeditorial.com/land-of-typos-part-gazillion-and-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oxford announces word of the year is &#8230; most boring word ever!</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonflyeditorial.com/oxford-announces-word-of-the-year-is-most-boring-word-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dragonflyeditorial.com/oxford-announces-word-of-the-year-is-most-boring-word-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 07:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reference materials]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dragonflyeditorial.com/~blog/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p id="top" />
<p>Well, the good folks at Oxford University Press have unveiled <a href="http://www.amazon.com/New-Oxford-American-Dictionary/dp/0195170776/ref=pd_sim_b_4/102-7941273-5108927">The New Oxford American Dictionary</a>â€™s Word of the Year for 2006. And it ain&#8217;t anything cute or even elegant.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s <em>carbon neutral</em>. I am yawning just typing it. Head to Oxford if you want <a href="http://blog.oup.com/oupblog/2006/11/what_do_al_gore.html">the definition</a>.</p>
<p>Their reasoning for choosing such a dud? Oxford&#8217;s <a href="http://blog.oup.com/oupblog/2006/09/who_is_erin_mck.html">Erin McKean</a>, editor of the OAD, writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>We know that people love fun, flashy words like truthiness &#8230; but we are always looking for a word that is both reflective of the events and concerns of the past year and also forward-looking: a word that we think will only become more used and more useful as time goes on.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>OK &#8230; I guess.
</p>
<p><!--de426479efe765053920b33514a9226b-->
</p>
<p><!--a947cfdaccc2a6afd6b6e137ad5d9efe--></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="top" />
<p>Well, the good folks at Oxford University Press have unveiled <a href="http://www.amazon.com/New-Oxford-American-Dictionary/dp/0195170776/ref=pd_sim_b_4/102-7941273-5108927">The New Oxford American Dictionary</a>â€™s Word of the Year for 2006. And it ain&#8217;t anything cute or even elegant.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s <em>carbon neutral</em>. I am yawning just typing it. Head to Oxford if you want <a href="http://blog.oup.com/oupblog/2006/11/what_do_al_gore.html">the definition</a>.</p>
<p>Their reasoning for choosing such a dud? Oxford&#8217;s <a href="http://blog.oup.com/oupblog/2006/09/who_is_erin_mck.html">Erin McKean</a>, editor of the OAD, writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>We know that people love fun, flashy words like truthiness &#8230; but we are always looking for a word that is both reflective of the events and concerns of the past year and also forward-looking: a word that we think will only become more used and more useful as time goes on.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>OK &#8230; I guess.
</p>
<p><!--de426479efe765053920b33514a9226b-->
</p>
<p><!--a947cfdaccc2a6afd6b6e137ad5d9efe--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dragonflyeditorial.com/oxford-announces-word-of-the-year-is-most-boring-word-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
