<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>dragonfly editorial &#187; Social media / Web 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dragonflyeditorial.com/blog/social-media-web-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dragonflyeditorial.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 18:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Ye Olde Guilde of Copyeditors</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonflyeditorial.com/ye-olde-guilde-of-copyeditors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dragonflyeditorial.com/ye-olde-guilde-of-copyeditors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 16:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Freelance editing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social media / Web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonflyeditorial.com/?p=669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p id="top" /><a href="http://www.dragonflyeditorial.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/writing_magnifying.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-670" title="writing_magnifying" src="http://www.dragonflyeditorial.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/writing_magnifying.png" alt="writing_magnifying" width="140" height="140" /></a>OK, I have no idea what the story is with this &#8212; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors">Wikipedia&#8217;s Guild of Copyeditors</a> &#8212; but just ran across it and need to learn more.</p>
<p>Appears to be a group of copyeditors (or, at minimum, English language natives) who volunteer to clean up the articles posted on Wikipedia.</p>
<p>Will report back ASAP.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="top" /><a href="http://www.dragonflyeditorial.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/writing_magnifying.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-670" title="writing_magnifying" src="http://www.dragonflyeditorial.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/writing_magnifying.png" alt="writing_magnifying" width="140" height="140" /></a>OK, I have no idea what the story is with this &#8212; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors">Wikipedia&#8217;s Guild of Copyeditors</a> &#8212; but just ran across it and need to learn more.</p>
<p>Appears to be a group of copyeditors (or, at minimum, English language natives) who volunteer to clean up the articles posted on Wikipedia.</p>
<p>Will report back ASAP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dragonflyeditorial.com/ye-olde-guilde-of-copyeditors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pew Foundation on the future of the Internet</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonflyeditorial.com/pew-foundation-on-the-future-of-the-internet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dragonflyeditorial.com/pew-foundation-on-the-future-of-the-internet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 00:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Social media / Web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dragonflyeditorial.com/~blog/?p=77</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p id="top" />Those of you involved in writing for the web, or in using social media as part of your marketing and communications campaigns, may be interested in reading this report. It&#8217;s the Pew Internet Project&#8217;s report on &#8220;the <a title="Pew Internet Project: Future of the Internet" href="http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/270/report_display.asp">Internet and American Life</a>,&#8221; and includes projections on how Internet-based technologies will affect American&#8217;s work lives and private lives.</p>
<p>Particularly interesting is Pew&#8217;s prediction on the eradication of work/life boundaries. Here&#8217;s how they see the year 2020:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">In 2020, well-connected knowledge workers in more-developed nations have willingly eliminated the industrial-age boundaries between work hours and personal time. Outside of formally scheduled activities, work and play are seamlessly integrated in most of these workers&#8217; lives. This is a net-positive for people. They blend personal/professional duties wherever they happen to be when they are called upon to perform them &#8212; from their homes, the gym, the mall, a library, and possibly even their company&#8217;s communal meeting space, which may exist in a new virtual-reality format.</p>
<p>Whether this will be a blessing or a curse&#8211;if it happens&#8211; remains to be seen.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="top" />Those of you involved in writing for the web, or in using social media as part of your marketing and communications campaigns, may be interested in reading this report. It&#8217;s the Pew Internet Project&#8217;s report on &#8220;the <a title="Pew Internet Project: Future of the Internet" href="http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/270/report_display.asp">Internet and American Life</a>,&#8221; and includes projections on how Internet-based technologies will affect American&#8217;s work lives and private lives.</p>
<p>Particularly interesting is Pew&#8217;s prediction on the eradication of work/life boundaries. Here&#8217;s how they see the year 2020:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">In 2020, well-connected knowledge workers in more-developed nations have willingly eliminated the industrial-age boundaries between work hours and personal time. Outside of formally scheduled activities, work and play are seamlessly integrated in most of these workers&#8217; lives. This is a net-positive for people. They blend personal/professional duties wherever they happen to be when they are called upon to perform them &#8212; from their homes, the gym, the mall, a library, and possibly even their company&#8217;s communal meeting space, which may exist in a new virtual-reality format.</p>
<p>Whether this will be a blessing or a curse&#8211;if it happens&#8211; remains to be seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dragonflyeditorial.com/pew-foundation-on-the-future-of-the-internet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lamest social media effort ever</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonflyeditorial.com/lamest-social-media-effort-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dragonflyeditorial.com/lamest-social-media-effort-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Social media / Web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dragonflyeditorial.com/~blog/?p=75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p id="top" />Social media can be a powerful marketing tool, because it builds credibility when real people discuss your product in a positive manner.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t work when marketers create <a title="fake blog" href="http://www.beckysteethblog.com/about-me/32/?t202id=3198&amp;t202kw=list%20by%20last%20name-gmail.com">&#8220;real people&#8221; who are obviously fake</a>.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="top" />Social media can be a powerful marketing tool, because it builds credibility when real people discuss your product in a positive manner.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t work when marketers create <a title="fake blog" href="http://www.beckysteethblog.com/about-me/32/?t202id=3198&amp;t202kw=list%20by%20last%20name-gmail.com">&#8220;real people&#8221; who are obviously fake</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dragonflyeditorial.com/lamest-social-media-effort-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The dilemma of social media</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonflyeditorial.com/the-dilemma-of-social-media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dragonflyeditorial.com/the-dilemma-of-social-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 03:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Social media / Web 2.0]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Technology and communications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dragonflyeditorial.com/~blog/?p=37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p id="top" />
<p>David Esrati at the <a title="The Next Wave" href="http://www.thenextwave.biz/main.html">Next Wave</a> is a big proponent of companies&#8217; participating actively in social media &#8212; having blogs on their websites, for example, as a way of increasing their site content and therefore the value of their site, and the amount of traffic the site brings in. Here are some excerpts from a comment I wrote in response to <a title="next wave post" href="http://www.thenextwave.biz/tnw/?p=323">one of David&#8217;s recent posts</a> &#8212; my concern is the difficulty of knowing how to get a client involved in social media &#8212; when they may not even have a website yet.</p>
<blockquote><p>These are difficult times we live in.</p>
<p>And Iâ€™m not talking about the threat of terrorism. Iâ€™m talking about the fact that there are multiple levels of knowledge and competence existent right now regarding website creation and maintenance.</p>
<p>Youâ€™ve got your businesses - some mom-and-pops, some multi-million dollar companies - who donâ€™t have websites and donâ€™t see a need to.</p>
<p>Youâ€™ve got your businesses that DO have websites â€” but ones that look like they were built in 1995. That perhaps were built in 1995, and havenâ€™t changed since.</p>
<p>Then youâ€™ve got your uber-professional websites. These may have a gorgeous look and feel - contain tens or hundreds of pages - and be built with the most sophisticated code yet typed out by a geek. Yet they may still suck, we know now, in terms of searchability - if theyâ€™re not dynamic (that is, having their content regularly updated) and if they donâ€™t actively engage customers in conversations (i.e., provide customers some sort of participative venue, such as a place to blog or a place to write product reviews).</p>
<p>As communicators, creatives, and marketing types, how do we know where to wade into this mess? How do we effectively talk to customers whose knowledge ranges from a ton to none? How do we help individuals with nary a website understand that (a) they gotta get one, (b)theyâ€™ve got to disregard the little that they THOUGHT they knew about what a website should look like, and (b) theyâ€™ve got to jump over traditional websites and dive feet first into the world of Web 2.0?</p>
<p>I know we canâ€™t start by scorning individuals or companies who havenâ€™t fully incorporated social media into their communications strategy. Letâ€™s face it - few have. (Even the biggies, like Coke.) And effectively telling folks that theyâ€™re clueless because they donâ€™t have a cutting-edge website - I would argue - just makes them more resistant to building one.</p>
<p>Which is unfortunate. Because social media is real. And companies need, rather desperately, to know how to respond to it, and create websites that TAKE ADVANTAGE of social media rather than being crushed by it. Companies need know how to create interact websites, rather than static ones. How to engage in conversations with their customers, rather than letting customers dish them left and right.</p>
<p>The world of user-generated content - and that includes everything from people writing blogs and wikis, joining social networking sites, or posting photos or videos to Flikr and YouTube â€” ainâ€™t going away. In fact, all evidence shows that social media usage is increasing - rapidly - across all age groups and both genders. (See <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.boozallen.com/capabilities/Industries/industries_article/26060199?lpid=660614">http://www.boozallen.com/capabilities/Industries/industries_article/26060199?lpid=660614</a>), for example.)</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>If it was ever unclear before, it&#8217;s crystal clear now that social media indeed canâ€™t be ignored. Companies - and ad agencies, PR firms, and corporate communicators - who do so, do so at their own peril.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><!--a15f389f8c059e89ce1dee0904f7cfc3-->
</p>
<p><!--40858d0994332c6c06e050d651f51caf--></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="top" />
<p>David Esrati at the <a title="The Next Wave" href="http://www.thenextwave.biz/main.html">Next Wave</a> is a big proponent of companies&#8217; participating actively in social media &#8212; having blogs on their websites, for example, as a way of increasing their site content and therefore the value of their site, and the amount of traffic the site brings in. Here are some excerpts from a comment I wrote in response to <a title="next wave post" href="http://www.thenextwave.biz/tnw/?p=323">one of David&#8217;s recent posts</a> &#8212; my concern is the difficulty of knowing how to get a client involved in social media &#8212; when they may not even have a website yet.</p>
<blockquote><p>These are difficult times we live in.</p>
<p>And Iâ€™m not talking about the threat of terrorism. Iâ€™m talking about the fact that there are multiple levels of knowledge and competence existent right now regarding website creation and maintenance.</p>
<p>Youâ€™ve got your businesses - some mom-and-pops, some multi-million dollar companies - who donâ€™t have websites and donâ€™t see a need to.</p>
<p>Youâ€™ve got your businesses that DO have websites â€” but ones that look like they were built in 1995. That perhaps were built in 1995, and havenâ€™t changed since.</p>
<p>Then youâ€™ve got your uber-professional websites. These may have a gorgeous look and feel - contain tens or hundreds of pages - and be built with the most sophisticated code yet typed out by a geek. Yet they may still suck, we know now, in terms of searchability - if theyâ€™re not dynamic (that is, having their content regularly updated) and if they donâ€™t actively engage customers in conversations (i.e., provide customers some sort of participative venue, such as a place to blog or a place to write product reviews).</p>
<p>As communicators, creatives, and marketing types, how do we know where to wade into this mess? How do we effectively talk to customers whose knowledge ranges from a ton to none? How do we help individuals with nary a website understand that (a) they gotta get one, (b)theyâ€™ve got to disregard the little that they THOUGHT they knew about what a website should look like, and (b) theyâ€™ve got to jump over traditional websites and dive feet first into the world of Web 2.0?</p>
<p>I know we canâ€™t start by scorning individuals or companies who havenâ€™t fully incorporated social media into their communications strategy. Letâ€™s face it - few have. (Even the biggies, like Coke.) And effectively telling folks that theyâ€™re clueless because they donâ€™t have a cutting-edge website - I would argue - just makes them more resistant to building one.</p>
<p>Which is unfortunate. Because social media is real. And companies need, rather desperately, to know how to respond to it, and create websites that TAKE ADVANTAGE of social media rather than being crushed by it. Companies need know how to create interact websites, rather than static ones. How to engage in conversations with their customers, rather than letting customers dish them left and right.</p>
<p>The world of user-generated content - and that includes everything from people writing blogs and wikis, joining social networking sites, or posting photos or videos to Flikr and YouTube â€” ainâ€™t going away. In fact, all evidence shows that social media usage is increasing - rapidly - across all age groups and both genders. (See <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.boozallen.com/capabilities/Industries/industries_article/26060199?lpid=660614">http://www.boozallen.com/capabilities/Industries/industries_article/26060199?lpid=660614</a>), for example.)</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>If it was ever unclear before, it&#8217;s crystal clear now that social media indeed canâ€™t be ignored. Companies - and ad agencies, PR firms, and corporate communicators - who do so, do so at their own peril.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><!--a15f389f8c059e89ce1dee0904f7cfc3-->
</p>
<p><!--40858d0994332c6c06e050d651f51caf--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dragonflyeditorial.com/the-dilemma-of-social-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
