dragonfly editorial

In the Navy

Posted by: Samantha Enslen, president and senior editor, December 2nd, 2009

091112-N-9500T-246.JPGI was helping a colleague edit a document on U.S. Navy policies this week, and talking with her about which style guide we should follow — GPO, Chicago, or AP.

Then, lo, a brief online search revealed . . . the U.S. Navy Style Guide! Who’d a thunk it?

Interestingly, the guide advises readers to use the AP Stylebook rather than GPO as a secondary reference. We tried this, but found that many Navy-specific terms, such as shipbuilder or linecrew, weren’t address in AP but were in GPO.

Thus, our style took a winding road: we looked first at the U.S. Navy Guide for style guidance, then at AP, and then at GPO.

Somehow it all worked out. Because ultimately, which style you choose is less important than making sure that a style — any style — is implemented consistently across your document. And that’s what we did.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, December 2nd, 2009 at 8:45 am and is filed under Editorial style. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

What do our clients think?

Press Releases

view archives

Latest Comments

  • Samantha: Great concept … I love the idea of creating a new life...
  • Tracy Salcedo-Chourre: I love the ellipses. It either makes you look...
  • Greg H: What a truly fabulous blog post! Who would imagine those simple,...